Ancient Indian Centres

Discovering the Ancient Charm of Nalanda: A Buddhist Learning Hub

What monks studied at Nalanda according to Chinese pilgrim accounts, which scholars tradition associates with it, and how the modern Nalanda University relates.

On this page
  1. What the sources tell us
  2. Subjects studied according to pilgrim accounts
  3. Scholars traditionally associated with Nalanda
  4. The library
  5. The modern Nalanda University
  6. A note on interpretation

What the sources tell us

Almost everything said about teaching at Nalanda comes from a few kinds of evidence: the travel accounts of Chinese monks, later Tibetan histories, and the material finds from the excavations. The pilgrim accounts are the most detailed, but they describe what visitors saw and heard, not an official syllabus. There is no surviving timetable or catalogue of courses, so the picture below is an informed reconstruction and should be read that way.

Subjects studied according to pilgrim accounts

Xuanzang, who stayed at Nalanda in the seventh century, described students working through Buddhist scriptures of more than one school as well as non-Buddhist learning. Yijing, who came a little later, wrote about monastic discipline and the kinds of study carried on there. Taken together, the accounts point to a broad programme:

  • Buddhist philosophy, including the Madhyamaka and Yogacara approaches that shaped later Mahayana thought
  • Logic and debate, which Buddhist scholars used to test and defend doctrine
  • Grammar and language study, which supported reading and translation
  • Medicine and other practical sciences
  • The Vedic tradition and other non-Buddhist views, studied partly so they could be answered in debate

Students were also expected to master the monastic code, and the accounts speak of strict entry examinations. How strict they were, and how many applicants passed, are matters on which sources are not precise. Xuanzang’s own account of his time with a teacher he names as Silabhadra is useful, but it is one traveller’s story. The role of Xuanzang at Nalanda, as a student and later as a translator in China, is a story in its own right.

Daily teaching probably combined memorisation, lectures, commentary and debate, a pattern also seen in later monastic education across Asia. Compared with that wider tradition, Nalanda’s distinctive feature was scale and range.

Scholars traditionally associated with Nalanda

Later Buddhist tradition, especially in Tibet, names a long line of Nalanda masters. Some of the most often cited are:

  • Nagarjuna and his pupil Aryadeva, associated with Madhyamaka. Their connection to Nalanda is traditional, and historians debate their dates and biographies.
  • Dignaga and Dharmakirti, linked with the development of Buddhist logic and epistemology.
  • Santideva, traditionally credited with a well-known guide to the bodhisattva path.
  • Santaraksita, a scholar who, according to Tibetan histories, travelled to Tibet in the eighth century.

These names are given here as tradition names them. Where they actually taught, and for how long, differs between sources, and some biographies were written long after the events. Several of the thinkers matter chiefly through their texts, which survive in Sanskrit, Tibetan or Chinese translation, rather than through any reliable account of their lives. The ideas behind these teachers are covered in the pieces on Buddhist doctrine and Buddhist philosophy.

The library

Later sources describe a large library housed in several buildings, and some accounts say it was destroyed by fire at the end of the monastery’s life. The details come from late and partial reports, so the size of the collection and the manner of its loss are uncertain. What is clearer is that manuscripts from the broader Nalanda tradition influenced translation work in Tibet and China, which is one reason the name carries so much weight in Buddhist history.

The modern Nalanda University

The modern Nalanda University is a separate, state-supported institution near Rajgir in Bihar, established under an Indian act of parliament passed in 2010. It was conceived as a revival of the ancient name and spirit rather than a direct continuation, and its teaching began in the middle of the following decade. A newer campus has since been developed. It offers modern postgraduate programmes, with schools that have included historical studies, ecology and environment, and Buddhist studies, philosophy and comparative religions, though the course list changes over time.

It is not a monastery and does not function as a pilgrimage site. Anyone hoping to visit should check the university’s current official information about access, since it is an active academic campus.

The ancient ruins, a few kilometres away, are a different matter. If you plan to see the ruins, remember that Bihar is hot in summer and the monsoon can disrupt travel, so check current weather and official notices.

A note on interpretation

It is tempting to picture Nalanda as a modern university with tens of thousands of students. The evidence supports something more modest: a large, organised monastic community with a notable reputation, whose exact size and structure are uncertain. Treating it as a major centre of Buddhist scholarship is safe. Repeating precise headcounts or course lists is not.

The complete guide to ancient indian centres

Exploring the Ancient Buddhist Monastery of Nalanda
Read the guide

Keep exploring

Guides from other topics

All topics →